![]() ![]() Christer: According to Eric Partridge's A Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English, "christer" - ostensibly derived from a name being taken in vain - was common among authors and typists in the 1920s.Ħ. ![]() (This is how "interrobang" gets its wondrously compound name.) In the 1950s, secretarial dictation and typesetting manuals in America also referred to the mark as "bang" - a term that might have, some speculate, come from comic books - which used the mark ! in dialogue balloons to represent the sound of a gun being fired.ģ. Bang: The term, per the graphic designer Allan Haley, likely originated with letterpress printing the mark is referred to as a "bang" in, among other places, typesetting manuals. The long-winded book contained this pithy poem: "This stop denotes our Suddain Admiration,/ Of what we Read, or Write, or giv Relation,/ And is always cal'd an Exclamation."Ģ. A 1680 book wonderfully titled Treatise of Stops, Points, or Pauses, and of Notes which are used in Writing and Print Both very necessary to be well known And the Use of each to be carefully taught - defines the mark according to its contemporary name. In English, the transition from "admiration" to "exclamation" seemed to take place in the mid-17th century, Lynne Truss notes in Eats, Shoots & Leaves. Admiration mark: From the time in the 15th century when printers introduced it as a type element, the exclamation point was known colloquially as a "note of admiration." Ben Jonson, according to Hitchings, used "admiration mark." And this usage is retained in Spanish and Portuguese, which refer to the exclamation point as a signo de admiración and ponto de exclamação, respectively. The marks' aliases, it turns out, are descriptive! And also alliterative!! And also wonderfully NSFW!!! And all, in their way, glorious.īelow, per Carey, with my additions, is a list of the many names of the exclamation point:ġ. ![]() So the language writer Stan Carey, building off of a passage in Henry Hitchings's book The Language Wars, has done something great: He has researched our exclamatory euphemisms. So it's no real surprise that the mark has been the product of a long evolution - and that, in the process, it has been known by many, many names. The exclamation will, despite and because of all the things that make it terrible, survive us all. And that's particularly so in the digital space, which so infamously encourages its proliferation (!!!!). The exclamation mark, I am trying to say, is the cockroach of the punctuation world. Again, it does not matter, because the exclamation point scoffs at your objections, and then extends toward you its peppy version of a middle finger: ! The exclamation mark, I am trying to say, is the cockroach of the punctuation world. The original method of dash-and-dot communication may be controversial it may be, at times, grating it may even drive our discourse - and us along with it - toward the tittering and the too-excited. In delightfulness it is trumped, like every other mark, by the interrobang.īut none of that matters, in the end, because the exclamation point, for all it lacks, has one thing going for it: tenacity. In practicality it is trumped by the comma, the apostrophe, the em-dash, and even, I would venture to say, the semicolon. The exclamation, for all its ubiquity, is neither the most useful nor the most delightful of punctuation marks. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |